This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
The realities of serious illness and critical care environments often complicate our efforts to evaluate treatment refusal according to the doctrine of informed consent. However, health professionals must strive to use informed consent as the ultimate standard for both treatment and nontreatment decisions, by making continual efforts to communicate with patients, share information, and enhance their sense of autonomy and control.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:Subscribe to Critical Care Clinics
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Clinical issues in the assessment of competency.Am. J. Psychiatry. 1981; 138: 1462-1467
- Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York1983
- Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital.N. Engl. J. Med. 1983; 309: 569-576
- Taking Care of Strangers. 1979;
- Therapeutic intervention scoring system: A method for quantitative comparison of patient care.Crit. Care Med. 1974; 2: 57-60
- Paternalism.The Monist. 1972; 56: 64-84
- Legal paternalism.Can. J. Philosophy. 1971; 1: 105-124
- Patient autonomy and “death with dignity.”.N. Engl. J. Med. 1979; 301: 404-408
- APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: A physiologically based classification system.Crit. Care Med. 1981; 9: 591-597
- Toward a model of the legal doctrine of informed consent.Am. J. Psychiatry. 1977; 134: 285-289
- On Liberty. Liberal Arts Press, New York1956
- Autonomy and the refusal of lifesaving treatment.Hastings Ctr. Rep. 1981; 11: 22-28
- President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C1983
- Report of the Medical Consultants on the Diagnosis of Death to the President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Guidelines for the determination of death.J.A.M.A. 1981; 246: 2184-2186
- Tests of competency to consent to treatment.Am. J. Psychiatry. 1977; 134: 279-284
- The physician’s responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients.N. Engl. J. Med. 1984; 310: 955-959
- ICU visiting policies.Crit. Care Med. 1984; 12: 606-608
- Family wishes and patient autonomy.Commentary. Hastings Ctr. Rep. 1980; 10: 21-22
© 1986 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.