Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 2, ISSUE 1, P53-60, January 1986

Encouraging Dialogue and Autonomy in the Burn Intensive Care Unit

  • Sharon H. Imbus
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Los Angeles County—University of Southern California Burn Center, Room 12-650, Los Angeles County—University of Southern California Medical Center, 1200 North State, Street Los Angeles, California 90033
    Affiliations
    Director of Special Bum Studies, Los Angeles County—University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
    Search for articles by this author
  • Bruce E. Zawacki
    Affiliations
    Director, Burn Service, Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center; and Associate Professor of Surgery, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      A systematic approach to autonomous decision making by patients as part of our standardized bum protocol ensures that our patients are given respect and a sense of control. This approach, which we believe to be ethically and legally sound, has no documented physiologic effect on our patients, but increases the self-determination they exercise and the communication they receive. The designation of a spokesperson to be consulted if the patient becomes unable to speak for himself prevents much anguish while retaining patient autonomy.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Critical Care Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. California Administrative Code. Section 70707. Title 22.
        List of Patient's Rights in California. 1981; (April)
      2. California Civil Code. Section 2500. Statutory Form.
        Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care. 1985;
        • Jackson D.L.
        • Youngner S.
        Patient autonomy and "death with dignity.".
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1979; 301: 404-408
        • Jonsen A.R.
        • Siegler M.
        • Winslade W.J.
        Clinical Ethics. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc, New York1982
        • Imbus S.H.
        • Zawacki B.E.
        Autonomy for bum patients when survival is unprecedented.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1977; 297: 308-311
        • Pellegrino E.D.
        • Thomasma D.C.
        A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice. Oxford University Press, New York1981
      3. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Principles in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Deciding to Forego Life-sustaining Treatment. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C1983
      4. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Making Health Care Decisions, Vol. 2. 1982;
        • Thomasma D.C.
        Limitations of the autonomy model for the doctor-patient relationship.
        The Pharos, Spring. 1983; : 2-5
        • Zawacki B.E.
        Doctor-patient covenant.
        J. Trauma. 1979; : 871-887
        • Zawacki B.E.
        • Robb J.W.
        • et al.
        Decision-making in the ICU: The ethical perspective.
        in: Bartlett R.H. Whitehouse Jr., W.M. Turcotte J. Life Support Systems in Intensive Care. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago1984