Ethics Committees in Critical Care

References

1. AMA judicial chairman sees emergence of hospital ethics panels as an inevitability.
   Fed. Am. Hosp. Rev. 1983; 16: 30
   • Google Scholar

2. Barber v. Superior Court, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (Cal. App. 1983).

   • Google Scholar
3. • California Medical Association: Guidelines on hospital ethics committees
   Cranford R.E. Doudera A.E. Institutional Ethics Committees and Health Care Decision Making. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor1984
   • Google Scholar
4. • Cranford R.E.
   • Doudera A.E.
   The emergence of institutional ethics committees.
   Law Med. Health Care. 1984; 121: 13-20
   • Scopus (30)
   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar
5. • Cranford R.E.
   • Doudera A.E.
   Institutional Ethics Committees and Health Care Decision Making. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor1984
   • Google Scholar

6. Fed. Reg. 45 CFR 1340 (December 10, 1984).

   • Google Scholar

7. Fed. Reg. 49 1622, 1651.

   • Google Scholar
8. In re Claire Conroy, slip opinion, New Jersey Supreme Court. 1985; (January 17)
   • Google Scholar

9. In re Mary Hier, 18 Mass. App. Ct. 200 (June 4, 1984

   • Google Scholar

10. In re Quinlan, 355 A. 2d 647 (N.J., 1976).

    • Google Scholar
11. • Jonsen A.
    • Siegler M.
    • Winslade W.
    Clinical Ethics. Macmillan, New York1982
    • Google Scholar
12. • Kelly M.J.
    • McCarthy D.G.
    Ethics Committees: A Challenge for Catholic Health Care. Catholic Health Association, St. Louis1984
    • Google Scholar
13. • Kleiman D.
    Prolonging life: The new dilemma. The New York Times, 1985 (January 14, 16, 18)
    • Google Scholar
14. • Lvnn J.
    • Childress J.
    Must patients always be given food and water?.
    Hastings Cent. Rep. 1983; 13: 17-21
    • Scopus (100)
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
15. • McCormick R.A.
    Ethics committees: Promise or peril?.
    Law Med. Health Care, 72:ISO-155. 1984;
    • Scopus (26)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
16. • Paris J.J.
    • Fletcher A.
    Infant Doe regulations and the absolute requirement to use nourishment and fluids for the dying infant.
    Law Med. Health Care. 1983; 11: 210-214
    • Scopus (14)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
17. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C1983
    • Google Scholar
18. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Summing Up. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C1983
    • Google Scholar

19. Pub. L. 93-247, 42 U.S.C. 561 (et. seq.).

    • Google Scholar
20. • Randal J.
    Are ethics committees alive and well?.
    Hastings Cent. Rep. 1983; 73: 10-12
    • Scopus (17)
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
21. • Siegler M.
    • Weisbard A.J.
    Against the emerging stream: Should fluids and nutritional support be discontinued?.
    Arch. Intern. Med. 1985; 745: 129-131
    • Scopus (67)
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar

22. Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. Saikewicz, 370 N.E. 2d 417 (1977).

    • Google Scholar
23. • Teel K.
    The physician's dilemma: A doctor's view: What should the law be?.
    Baylor Law Rev. 1975; 27: 6-21
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. • Wanzer S.
    • Adelstein J.
    • Cranford R.E.
    • et al.
    Physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients.
    N. Engl. J. Med. 1984; 310: 955-959
    • Scopus (244)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
25. • Zerwekh J.V.
    The dehydration question.
    Nursing 83. 1983; 73: 47-49
    • Scopus (82)
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar